RE: upper limit to df reported available size?

[Jay K <jay dot krell at cornell dot edu>]

 >  I guess what we really need
 > is to redefine fsblkcnt_t to become a 64 bit type. Oh well, this
 > requires another backward compatibility hack, just like back when we
 > switched to 64 bit off_t (Cygwin 1.5). Let's do it at the same time as
 > we change sigset_t and time_t to 64-bits(with knock-on effects to
 > struct stat, among others). In other words,all good changes, but certainly
 > something that will take a lot ofplanning to pull off in one go.
 
 
Can you fix the jmp_buf size then too maybe?
It is blown up by a factor of 4.
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2009-01/msg00863.html
 
I realize it has less/no value to fixing.
But I'm not sure how changing the others won't require *everything*
(just about) to be recompiled anyway. Maybe you rename functions somehow?
 
 
Thanks,
 - Jay

  		 	   		  

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple