This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Unwanted .exe appended to symlinks
- From: fergus <fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Cc: Eric Blake <ebb9 at byu dot net>, fergus <fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:00:28 +0100
- Subject: Re: Unwanted .exe appended to symlinks
- References: <1120880636.6400.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42CFD190.2060109@byu.net>
- Reply-to: fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net
Thanks for your very rapid and informative responses, and also the
suggestions and references http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html#TOC53)
(How can I access other drives?) to using mounts rather than symlinks.
Alol the same I've got a small preference for
ln -s /cygdrive/h h
over
mkdir /h; mount -fsb h:/ /h
which is probably easily addressed, but it is as follows.
Both instructions are intended to be issue-once-only. With the former
arrangement (symlinks) the command
find /
(usually with qualifications of course) finds only folders on the root
filesystem. If I want to include devices then additionally I
mkdir /cygdrive
and lo! the command find / includes all the linked devices. Whereas,
with the latter arrangement (mounts) the command
find /
always includes the mounted devices; not usually, or certainly not
often, what I want.
(I know these behaviours are as easily modified by unmounting/
remounting drives as by removing/ recreating links, and that mount-ing
more accurately mimics what is done in Unix, but I just happen to like
the symlink approach. I'm not saying it's better, in fact I imagine
there are many reasons why it isn't.)
Fergus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/