This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Missed patch? (gettimeofday time travels V2)


 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:55:15PM -0800, Fish wrote:
> > 
> >Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to
> >gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST events
> >(PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND, PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC,
> >PBT_APMRESUMECRITICAL) hasn't made it into the sources yet?
> >
> >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html
> >
> >Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another
> >reason for it not being applied?
> 
> Perhaps it would be instructive if you read the whole thread.

Perhaps I already did.

Perhaps it doesn't explain what is meant by "sacrific[ing] accuracy
for precision", nor precisely WHY "QueryPerformance* functions [is]
bad news", nor cite the vague "various references" mentioned.

AND PERHAPS you could just answer my question or perhaps point me to
a different thread instead (that perhaps DOES have the answers I
seek) instead of wasting my others' time with such unhelpful replies.

Do you think perhaps that is possible?

Or is that perhaps asking too much?

- -- 
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
   fish@infidels.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPiTLhkj11/TE7j4qEQLVBwCdFFe/nmRUBU9AcrAOtwI4oeH4pqsAoLdR
qQYOSaG9Dra0JgJLC31AR12D
=StPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]