Re: ls problem

[Randall R Schulz <rrschulz at cris dot com>]

Carlo,

I think your next step must be to run "ls" under "strace" and see where the 
excess time (presumably idle time) is going.

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 17:00 2002-11-19, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> I tried disabling ntsec and "ls -l" is still slow.  I'm using 
> 1.3.15-cygwin-1-3-15-1.  "ls -l" and "ls -ln" takes almost the same amount 
> of time.    On a directory with 3 short text files, the difference, when I 
> timed "ls -l" and "ls -b", is still considerable.
>
> fcarlo@ZEUS~
> $ time ls -b
> a  b  test
>
> real    0m0.024s
> user    0m0.030s
> sys     0m0.015s
>
> fcarlo@ZEUS ~
> $ time ls -l
> total 11
> -rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None            5 Nov 19 13:58 a
> -rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None            5 Nov 19 13:58 b
> -rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None         8283 Nov 19 13:59 test
>
> real    0m1.819s
> user    0m0.030s
> sys     0m0.000s
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Carlo Florendo

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/