This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: paths like //usr/local


a path like //usr/local is treated as an UNC path.
this might leads to problems when an application is using //usr/local as a normal "unix"-path.

i don't know how to overcome the problem, but one might think of a path like /unc/computer/share instead of using the path //computer/share

what was the idea behind the current behaviour?
Do you think that Microsoft employees read this mailing list?  I'm sure
that there are one or two but I doubt that they could speak definitively
about why Microsoft chose this behavior.
cygwin translates paths like /usr/local to c:\cygwin\usr\local and manages mount-points etc...
cygwin opffers a complete "virtual filesystem"

the cygwin-developers chose, to NOT convert //usr/local to c:\cygwin\usr\local

i would like to know why.




--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]