This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re [2]: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot causepage fault in kernel32.dl


----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Smith" <dannysmith@clear.net.nz>
To: <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Sunday, 23 June 2002 13:42
Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot
cause page fault in kernel32.dl

Ooops

 This may be culprit:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-06/msg00130.html


Danny

> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:46:29PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> >PT>> 3) The new binutils has something to do with the crash
> >
> >I've found the following:
> >
> > Old 'ld'(200110) seems to place the following symbols and the first
> > '.data_cygwin_nocopy' on a the same  place - '_data_end__' and
> > 'wsock_started'.
> >
> > New 'ld' places them in the following order:
> >   1. '_data_end__'
> >   2. first '.data_cygwin_nocopy' section and 'wsock_started'
starting
> >      4 bytes after '_data_end__'.
> >
> >Of course it may have nothing to do with the crash - if so just tell
me
> >and I'll shut up :)
>
> That's actually an interesting observation.  Thanks.
>
> I can confirm that the test version of binutils is doing something
> funky.  I've removed that version from sourceware




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]