This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re [2]: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot causepage fault in kernel32.dl
- From: Danny Smith <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>
- To: cygwin at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:45:20 +1200
- Subject: Re [2]: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot causepage fault in kernel32.dl
- Reply-to: Danny Smith <dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Smith" <dannysmith@clear.net.nz>
To: <cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Sunday, 23 June 2002 13:42
Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot
cause page fault in kernel32.dl
Ooops
This may be culprit:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-06/msg00130.html
Danny
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:46:29PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> >PT>> 3) The new binutils has something to do with the crash
> >
> >I've found the following:
> >
> > Old 'ld'(200110) seems to place the following symbols and the first
> > '.data_cygwin_nocopy' on a the same place - '_data_end__' and
> > 'wsock_started'.
> >
> > New 'ld' places them in the following order:
> > 1. '_data_end__'
> > 2. first '.data_cygwin_nocopy' section and 'wsock_started'
starting
> > 4 bytes after '_data_end__'.
> >
> >Of course it may have nothing to do with the crash - if so just tell
me
> >and I'll shut up :)
>
> That's actually an interesting observation. Thanks.
>
> I can confirm that the test version of binutils is doing something
> funky. I've removed that version from sourceware
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/