This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Should suggests to downgrade? [WAS: Lillypond for Cygwin]
- From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke at gnu dot org>
- To: "David A. Cobb" <superbiskit at cox dot net>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 22:10:24 +0200
- Subject: Should suggests to downgrade? [WAS: Lillypond for Cygwin]
- Organization: Jan at Appel
- References: <3CA8B996.9050302@cox.net>
"David A. Cobb" <superbiskit@cox.net> writes:
[cc:cygwin@cygwin.com]
> Hi, Jan. I hope you won't mind an off-list question.
For this time I won't mind, but a question to lilypond-user@gnu.org
would have been better (maybe others found this problem too).
> I downloaded Tetex with Lillypad about a month ago and got 20001218-4.
> When I go to Cygwin, SETUP keeps offering to install 20001218-1 ( -3
> if I pick 'Test').
> So, which is right? --
Latest is always best, but -3 should also work. We should move -3 out
of test and into the curr. Same goes for tetex-beta, I think.
By the way, are you using the latest setup.exe from Cygwin? Setup.exe
should never suggest to downgrade, I think. Hmm, now I'm thinking
about cc'ing the cygwin list, you wouldn't mind, I hope?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/