This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: building gcc/g++ seems OK but building g77 seems to be seriously broken
- To: ted byers <ted dot byers at sympatico dot ca>
- Subject: Re: building gcc/g++ seems OK but building g77 seems to be seriously broken
- From: Mumit Khan <khan at NanoTech dot Wisc dot EDU>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:23:49 -0500 (CDT)
- cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, ted byers wrote:
> Well, I have now built GCC3 a couple times, trying to figure out what has
> gone awry, but nothing seems to fix g77 (the summary given below show why I
> think it is seriously broken). gcc and g++ seem to be OK since their
> respective test suites give the expected results (the number of unexpected
> failures being extemely small).
When you report gcc build problems, you really need to provide the flags
you passed to configure. Too many variables otherwise.
> === g77 Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 281
> # of unexpected failures 334
> # of untested testcases 326
> /home/Bted/Objects/gcc/g77 g77 version 3.0 (Fortran Frontend version 0.5.26
> 20010617 (experimental))
Probably a problem in the g77 tests, which passes the -lm, and that causes
a problem on Cygwin 1.1.x.
Regards,
Mumit
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/