This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: binutils-2.11.2.tar.bz2
- To: "Mark Sheppard" <mark at ddf dot net>,<cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: RE: binutils-2.11.2.tar.bz2
- From: "bmj2001" <bmj2001 at bellsouth dot net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:38:03 -0500
I already got it dearchived.
I've been trying to build it since yesterday or the day before.
It fails its make check.
-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
[mailto:cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Mark Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:20 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: binutils-2.11.2.tar.bz2
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:02:59PM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, bmj2001 wrote:
>
> > tar --use=bzip2 -xf
>
> How about use gzip as more known and accetable standard?
Bzip2 is getting more popular as it has better compression than gzip.
It is a slower algorithm, but the speed of computers is increasing so
that's getting to be less of a problem. Tar already supports bzip2
with the -j option (newish GNU tars that is):
tar -jxf whatever.tar.bz2
Mark.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple