This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Nutcracker Vs cygwin
- To: <cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com>
- Subject: RE: Nutcracker Vs cygwin
- From: "Josh Baudhuin" <joshb@Cadence.COM>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 09:22:40 -0700
u/win has GNU tools support, doesn't it? Mumit Khan has ported egcs to that
environment as well. Or do you refer to something else...
-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com
[mailto:cygwin-owner@sourceware.cygnus.com]On Behalf Of Suhaib M.
Siddiqi
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 1999 8:47 am
To: ssiddiqi@ipass.net; cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Nutcracker Vs cygwin
Parr, Ian D wrote:
>
> Has anyone performed an evaluation/comparison of both products ?
> Would they care to share their findings ?
>
> Regards
>
> Ian Parr
Yes. Bascially you are on your own. NutCracker(NC), so does UWIN,
lacks the GNU tools support. That means most of the source codes
can be compiled with less efforts with Cygwin.
Also the X Windows system support is same in NC, you need their X-server
to run the applications. You also need to their versions of
X11 and MOTIF to port. In Cygwin you have access to all these tools
(X11) with much less restrictions.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com