This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
Re: bug report/suggested temp. patch: handling bursts of sent keys
- From: Mark Lillibridge <mark dot lillibridge at hp dot com>
- To: <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
- Cc: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:32:13 -0700
- Subject: Re: bug report/suggested temp. patch: handling bursts of sent keys
- References: <201001102040.o0AKenLB010951@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <201001191817.o0JIHoS1030183@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <6b9bc6ee1001230517v73231f5cma1503fa473a5d11c@mail.gmail.com> <201001232202.o0NM2HAl027114@mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com> <4B703361.3050304@dronecode.org.uk> <qmhy6iwriiw.fsf@ts-rhel4.hpl.hp.com> <4B840ABE.8080106@dronecode.org.uk>
- Reply-to: mark dot lillibridge at hp dot com
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
On February 23, 2010, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 13/02/2010 20:24, Mark Lillibridge wrote:
> > Jon wrote:
> >> Thanks for the patch. Have you actually tested that this resolves your problem?
> >
> > Yes. Of course, really, really large bursts will still fail, but
> > they should be very rare.
> >
>
> Perhaps you might try the attached patch, instead, and see if that helps.
Yes, your (previously) attached patch seems to solve the problem
without wasting memory or only working for a finite number of keys.
Nice job. What's the next step towards getting this patch added to the
source/sent upstream/to Xming?
- Thanks,
Mark
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/