This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- To: <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 15:14:53 +1100
- Subject: RE: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:52 PM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 06:06:16PM -0500, Harold Hunt wrote:
> >> > Fine. But how do you implement them on 9x/Me?
> >>Perhaps the same way I implemented FIFO's, but easier as
> the semantics
> >>seem less complex to me.
> >>
> >>Anyway, sure we don't need to have bot NT and 9x all at the same
> >>time...
> >
> >Sounds logical to me. There is no reason to limit the
> performance on
> >Windows NT/2000/XP just because there would need to be a seperate
> >routine for Windows 95/98/Me.
>
> I'm glad it sounds logical. Cygwin already has lots of code
> that is NT specific, e.g., CYGWIN=ntsec.
I agree. I got the impression from Corinna's email that what Ralf was
suggesting needed a 9x equivalent to be seriously considered. I'm not
100% sure why I got that impression though....
Rob