This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: rebaseall [1.7]: cyggcc_s-1.dll error
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:51:37 +0200
- Subject: Re: rebaseall [1.7]: cyggcc_s-1.dll error
- References: <1277822045.12015.1382454075@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4C2A04C9.5000202@redhat.com> <20100629144014.GA25176@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Jun 29 10:40, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:35:53AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >On 06/29/2010 08:34 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >> Eric Blake wrote:
> >>> Phooey. dash now depends on cyggcc_s-1.dll, so rebaseall needs to be
> >>> taught to add this library to the list of exemptions (similar to
> >>> cygwin1.dll).
> >>
> >> Or dash could be rebuilt using -static-libgcc. It's not like dash needs
> >> to worry about throwing C++ exceptions across DLL boundaries, and if
> >> dash is meant to be a /bin/sh implementation (even if cygwin still uses
> >> bash for that), then IMO it ought to be -- insofar as is possible --
> >> statically linked.
> >
> >OK, I'm now trying to figure out how to add -static-libgcc into my
> >cygport file. Look for an updated dash later today...
>
> In the meantime, you might want to consider linking dash with -static-libgcc.
There's a good chance that Eric will have bad dreams about hundreds
of tiny static libgcc's biting and clawing there way into his house
tonight, and all he has for defense is a single gcc4 knife...
Corinna