Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:54:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>----Original Message----
>>From: Gary R. Van Sickle
>>Sent: 12 September 2005 00:11
>
>> Did you miss this part sir?:
>> 
>> "Please point out an instance of where I have "flamed" you, so that I may
>> apologize, and we can both put the terrible tragedy behind us."
>> 
>> If it's "flame", let's put it out.  If it ain't, let's stop the false
>> accusations, huh?
>> 
>>> Instead, I invite you to privately reread all your messages
>>> criticising others and reflect upon them.
>> 
>> No, you're the one doing the accusing, it's your job to do the legwork. 
>> If indeed there are "all [these] messages criticising others" flowing
>> from me, 
>> it should surely be trivial to find just one example that's a "flame" in
>> the archives, should it not?
>
>
>  Hahaaa!  Classic old UPA technique:  demand proof from someone that you
>have flamed them (or someone else), wait for them to go off, dig up and post
>a few google groups links to your old material, then the minute they do
>start pointing and laughing at them and jumping up and down going "haha I
>t0rlled j00 into googlestalking me fanboi!".  <nostalgic sigh> It's just
>like Usenet circa 1997 all over again.

UPA?  Ukrainian Planetariums Association?  Unauthorized Precedence Announcement?
Utah Psychological Association?

cgf