This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: I want to believe!
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'what we need now is MORE PIRATES!'" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:06:38 +0100
- Subject: RE: I want to believe!
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
----Original Message----
>From: Corinna Vinschen
>Sent: 11 August 2005 12:59
> On Aug 11 12:45, Dave Korn wrote:
>> ----Original Message----
>>> From: James R. Phillips
>>> Sent: 11 August 2005 07:19
>>
>>> Hm, I don't usually post or even read this list, but now you've tempted
>>> me. The original thread seems to have been back in April? So perhaps
>>> you are referring to the recent buzz over ID (Intelligent Design); I
>>> guess it made the cover of _Time_.
>>>
>>> There are a lot of misconceptions regarding ID. It isn't creationism at
>>> all; it is based on scientific methodologies used every day in fields
>>> such as anthropology or archeology.
>>
>> No, you've got it all wrong! I said I was converted, and I have been!
>> I not only believe in ID, I know exactly *who* the designer is and _how_
>> he did it!
>>
>> We are all touched by his noodly appendage!
>
> Huh? Can you please make jokes which are also recognizable as such
> by non-native english speakers?
"Alle wir werden durch seinen Nudlich Anhang berührt". (I'm sure that
babelfish will have adequately translated that for me!)
>At least I'm pretty sure that you're joking.
>
> I just read the article.
>
> "Instead, they argue that design is the best scientific explanation for
> the stunning complexity of the cellular processes that underlie life,
> and for the evidence of how life actually developed."
Wrong article. I was referring to http://www.venganza.org/ as per my
first post in this thread! If you haven't read it yet, you should; it's a
very important contribution to the debate.
> What a crap. Take a couple of billion micro-organisms and give them
> a billion years time to get used to their environment. Doesn't sound
> too surprising to me that a lot of intelligently appearing live forms
> are a result of that process. No place for a creator in that picture
> if you ask me.
(I'll write a serious-minded rebuttal of the claims in the article when I
have more spare time.)
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....