This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: CYGWIN=codepage? Or LC_CTYPE=foo?
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:05:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: CYGWIN=codepage? Or LC_CTYPE=foo?
- References: <20080406111355.GB27048@calimero.vinschen.de> <20080406143942.GG23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <s1slk3r55qz.fsf@gilthoniel.jaist.ac.jp> <20080406192618.GK23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <s1smyo6ocj5.fsf@gilthoniel.jaist.ac.jp> <20080407094822.GA12184@calimero.vinschen.de> <s1sr6dhlt22.fsf@gilthoniel.jaist.ac.jp> <20080407134225.GO23852@calimero.vinschen.de> <uwsn8g05z.fsf@jaist.ac.jp> <20080408112833.GX23852@calimero.vinschen.de>
- Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Hi Kazuhiro,
On Apr 8 13:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 8 18:34, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:42:25 +0200
> > >>> Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> said:
> >
> > > How big is the table? We have probably bigger datastructures
> > > in Cygwin than this one.
> >
> > It consumes 3.7 Kbytes. Ah, the table of devices is much bigger.
>
> 4K is really nothing to worry about.
>
> > > Also, if we do it, it would make sense to have the faithful
> > > solution, I think. Corporate environments might be glad to
> > > have this and even for us developers it could help to test
> > > problems in native environments.
> >
> > OK, I leave the implementation faithful to Unix.
>
> Thanks!
do you already have something we could check in? If I can help you,
don't hesitate to ask!
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat