RE: fork on win95

["Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:28 AM
> To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: fork on win95
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:53:31AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf@redhat.com>
> >
> >
> >> Hmm.  As I said, I actually tried my changes under Windows 95, so
> >> this will be difficult to track down, since I can't duplicate it.
> >
> >I'll see what sort of info I can generate for you, but I'm 
> still pleading
> >time shortage right now. I'll generate a strace as a minimum 
> (ie strace
> >sh -c ls) which should show the failure to fork(). Anything 
> else that might
> >spark neurons?
> >
> >> Thanks for not saying "It worked fine in B20.1", by the way.  :-)
> >
> >I forgot to mention that!. Doh!.
> 
> Jeez.  At the very *least* you could mention that fork works 
> fine for you
> on linux.  I need some reference point after all.
> 

See - telepathy works - you recieved that info!. Did you receive the
strace I just watched :].

As you've duplicated it I'll skip mailing you data for now - but if you
do want extra detail let me kknow.

Rob