This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:24:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: [RFU 1.5 and 1.7] libaprutil1-1.3.7
- References: <4A48F582.2060509@acm.org> <20090630083011.GQ30864@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A4A3713.10603@acm.org> <20090701105222.GA15253@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A4B9392.2000407@acm.org>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Jul 1 09:49, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 7/1/2009 3:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 30 09:02, David Rothenberger wrote:
>>> On 6/30/2009 1:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> Here, the aprutil1 package still exists in the 1.7 release area, but
>>>> I don't think it makes sense anymore, along the same lines as for
>>>> libapr1. I think it should be ok to remove it from the 1.7 release.
>>>> What do you say?
>>> The aprutil1 and apr1 packages are just transition packages to help
>>> people upgrade from the old package naming schema to the new one.
>>> They don't need to be in the 1.7 area if we believe everyone will
>>> have updated their apr1 and aprutil1 packages before they try to
>>> upgrade to 1.7. I'm not sure that's true, though. It seems there are
>>> at least some people that only update once every 3-5 years. :-)
>>
>> So you'd rather have the apr1 package in the 1.7 release as well?
>
> I don't know the right answer.
What I was trying to say is this: It's your choice.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat