Re: lapack 3.0 (OpenGL and ncurses maintainers please take note)

["James R. Phillips" <antiskid56-cygwin at yahoo dot com>]

--- Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> 
> I'd opt for /opt (sorry for the pun).  Bigger and more complex packages
> are better served by getting their own /opt subdir in the long run.
> Charles is asking for /opt for a while now anyway.  Perhaps the lapack
> package would be a good start.
> 

Please look over the directory structure of the trial binary package at

ftp://antiskid.homelinux.net/pub/lapack

It doesn't seem all that complex to me, but if it passes the "/opt complex"
threshold for you, please advise how package subtrees would best be
reallocated.  I.E. should /opt have its own share/doc subtree, etc.

Thanks,

Jim Phillips