This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:03:23AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >Thats cool. The offer remains open. arch would be great for this (as it > >addresses all the points above :}), but I simply don't have time to port > >it properly to cygwin. > > "arch"? As in Tom Lord's arch? *Shudder* Is the shudder over Tom, or arch ? If Tom, then I can understand ;]. If arch itself - have you tried a recent version? I've found arch to be incredibly useful, making some of the things I'd fought with CVS to make happen trivial. (Notably disconnected work and local branches). > Maybe we should see if bitkeeper will donate some code to us. After all they > use cygwin for some of their stuff. Seems only fair. Could be. Mind you, I can't use bitkeeper (and don't want to). Hopefully I won't start an incessant discussion if I mention that a) the licence prevents me using it ( I've a side-project called barch, which is a C++ implementation of the arch logic) and b) the compulsory public-visibility for 'free' use of it really sticks in my craw. > Then we get reasonable people with reasonable support. > > Perhaps even better, we could then have incessant discussions about the > fact that bitkeeper isn't free and we could cast aspersions on Larry > McVoy's character (inside joke for anyone who reads linux-kernel). > > cgf > TCM TCM? Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |