RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)

["Ebrey, Carl" <Carl dot Ebrey at uk dot experian dot com>]

A perhaps more constructive response would be to refer you to
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml and
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html.  It doesn't take a genius to
figure out that I'm personally in favour of the first.

One thing I would like to say though is that I've been quite annoyed by the
attitudes that come over on this mailing list.  The last time I checked
Cygwin was an open project, available for anyone to contribute and offer
help.  However, all I've seen is help being thrown back in people's faces,
including my own.  If you don't want people to help, don't have an open
project.  It's quite simple.

My rather frustrated 2p/c/whatever.

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: cygwin-Apps@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)


On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -0000, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
>Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line?  That
>would Make Things Easier(TM), IMHO of course :)

How about if I just block any email that mentions "Reply-To"?  That
would make things a lot easier for me.

cgf


=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF