This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Grant, >What sort of differences did you find? I could not compile the standard c library with the 32 bit toolchain on a 64 bit host, when the same library would build fine on the 32 bit host. I have ran into this issue many times during the second stage of the toolchain build on a 64 bit host. Same gcc/glibc sources would compile on a 32 bit host but would fail on a 64 bit. R -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: 32-bit host vs 64-bit host From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> Date: Tue, February 25, 2014 1:31 pm To: crossgcc@sourceware.org On 2014-02-25, <roman@kolesnikov.mobi> <roman@kolesnikov.mobi> wrote: > I found the difference in building the libraries and file systems. What sort of differences did you find? > Making 32 bit chroot on 64 bit system was an extra nuisance. You don't need to do that to run an existing 32-bit-host toolchain, but you might need to do that to build a 32-bit-host toolchain on a 64-bit. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! My haircut is totally at traditional! gmail.com -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |