This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 1 Sep 2011, yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2011 21:08:02 Bill Pringlemeir wrote: >> It seems that newer versions of glibc and eglibc use a 'TI-RPC'. >> Is anyone aware of a FAQ/Howto on TI-RPC conversion? Are there >> RPC api changes or just library and header adjustments? > [--SNIP--] >> For now, I rebuilt with 2.13 but I understand that IPv6 support is >> probably good to have as standard. > I already sent an RFC about two months ago: > http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2011-07/msg00014.html Thanks Yann. Resolution are to have 'TI-RPC' as a package and make that a pre-requisite for the other packages and use it's include paths, etc. Alternately figure out how not to use RPC, if a packages './configure' supports it... Or stick with 2.13. I don't think the package I was building with was related to NFS. There is no "--with-rpc=" option to the e?glibc. This looks like the current repository, http://git.infradead.org/users/steved/libtirpc.git I am sure I read your original message. Some how, I didn't think it would affect me at that time... I might try 2.14 again some time. Thanks again, Bill Pringlemeir. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |