This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I was running from hg (retrieved Thursday/Friday). I enabled the gold/ld option and the ld is 'gold' of course. However, eglibc fails with an obcure "Linker version too old" or some such. I looked on some mailing lists and it appears that glibc (and I guess eglibc) need the ld.bfd. The reason is that the libraries need linker script support which gold doesn't have. So has anyone build with just 'gold' and/or 'gold/ld' (where gold is 'ld' and 'ld.bfd' is the older gnu ld)? I think we might want to disable this option, if it is to be release as is. I looked briefly at the eglibc configure option. There was a '--with-binutils' that maybe we could provide an alternate directory with the gnu ld as the 'primary' or maybe just symlinks or something. I was a little surprised that the ld wasn't a symlink of gold but an actual copy. I guess I can just do a copy in the final tool directory to make gold the default when I start with ld/gold? Sorry if this has already been gone over. Fwiw, Bill Pringlemeir. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |