This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:55:38AM -0600, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>: > > > >I think the patches might need to be split, and there should > >be a config option for each patch which spells out the upsides > >and downsides in the help text so the user has all the information > >to make the right choice. > > This is not be a bad idea, just in case there are issues with > specific architectures. But this would complicate the proposed > patching directory structure even further. > > I don't believe that there has been a lot of work done on hardening > embedded systems, outside of proprietary solution. > This is one of the reasons why I brought this up, instead of just > adding these features to Devil-Linux. > > I'm sure there are going to be a few issues which we have to iron > out, but the benefits are a much more secure system. Well, I don't expect you to work this out all by yourself, but these were the questions I would search the answers for if I had time to work on it......... Cheers, Johannes -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |