This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Titus von Boxberg <titus@v9g.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > does anybody know why linking for ARM cpus > is much slower than for others? > I'm using tool chains for ELF/Linux/glibc > for X86, PowerPC and ARM. > binutils is of version 2.20 Have you tried 2.20.1 or 2.21? I'd say if the problem still exists there, try posting something to: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/ I've been building for the same architectures (ppc for e500, arm for xscale). Granted I've been more concerned with functionality over compile time, but next time I build, I will try comparing build times. > Linking the same software is about 4 times slower > for ARM than for the other CPUs. > What might be the reason? If you could give an example of a package you are building, I will build the same package and compare build times. Hopefully then we can start to dig into the problem. > (And it takes an INCREDIBE amount of time anyway > when including debug symbols). > > Thanks already. > Regards > Titus > > > > -- > For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq > > Hope I can help, -Bryan -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |