This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Have you, at the very least, taken the time discuss this on gcc mailing list ? >> >> I didn't think that I would have to talk with the gcc developers to >> get a patch into crosstool-ng. >> Maybe I'm wrong? >> > no, and I've no decisional power over crosstool-ng, my point is "do > you know what is this patch doing ?", and "do you understand this > patch ?". This is a question you cannot answer, neither do Yann. I do > not assume Buildroot people know what their doing either. > you can translate this by: unless a patch has been blessed by gcc people (ie. people who *do* understand what they're doing) and it has been reported on gcc bugzilla, it is worthless. That said, I know that Yann is fond of importing random stuff written by random people as long a it fixes obscure corner case encountered the deep Siberia. He still did not prove me the opposite. I'm still waiting for him to confirm me he understand all the patches present in ct-ng. - Arnaud -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |