This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Static toolchain support

From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven at gmail dot com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar at gmail dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:39:15 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Static toolchain support
References: <patchbomb.1287436322@lenny> <AANLkTikz8CQJDQGochpAP4=QPodUyqKHXT_af17LjF6C@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote:
>> These commits add support for statically linked toolchains.
>> You must turn on CT_EXPERIMENTAL to use this toolchain, as there
>> is still one problem left to solve.
>>
>> The toolchain that is produced builds static and dynamic binaries
>> with the (GNU/Linux) elf header rather then the expected (SYSV) elf header.
>>
>> I have found two articles on the topic where one says it is a problem with
>> binutils, and the other says it is a problem with (e)glibc.
>>
>> Any suggestions on fixing this?
>>
> Not yet, but having articles' URLs might be helpful.
>
> Â- Arnaud
>

http://cygwin.ru/ml/binutils/2010-02/msg00377.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2010-10/msg00005.html

-- 
Bryan Hundven
bryanhundven@gmail.com

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- [PATCH 0 of 2] Static toolchain support
  - From: Bryan Hundven
- Re: [PATCH 0 of 2] Static toolchain support
  - From: Arnaud Lacombe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]