This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday, 29 ×September 2009 18:48:23 Richard Strand wrote: > The toolchain is working perfectly for me and I've not run into any > problems yet. Changing to -O2 sounds like a good idea as long as it > doesn't break builds for any other architectures. I'm not sure if it's related, but AFAIR g++ only consider inline of C++ methods with -O2 or more (maybe some of the inline methods are crucial for g++ or glibc itself). -- Oron Peled Voice: +972-4-8228492 oron@actcom.co.il http://users.actcom.co.il/~oron "A standard for copy protection is as premature as a standard for teleportation." --- Noted computer security expert and Princeton University Professor Edward Felten. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |