This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] CT-ng: Remove obsolete 130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch for newer glibc's.

According to Mike Frysinger, this patch hasn't been necessary since
glibc-2.4+, so turf it from glibc patches 2.5 and up.  If someone
complains, it can always go back in.

---

Index: patches/glibc/2.5.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch
===================================================================
--- patches/glibc/2.5.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(revision 549)
+++ patches/glibc/2.5.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(working copy)
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-From http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-cvs-commit@pld-linux.org/msg00229.html
-Fixes
-  rtld.c: In function '_dl_start':
-  dynamic-link.h:47: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela_relative' declared but never defined
-  dynamic-link.h:41: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela' declared but never defined
-when compiling glibc-2.3.4 with gcc-4.0
-
-But see also
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-02/msg00000.html
-and
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-03/msg00008.html
-which seem to propose less radical fixes?
-
-Aha.  See also http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=721
-
---- glibc-2.3.6.orig/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:37.000000000 -0800
-+++ glibc-2.3.6/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:59.777820848 -0800
-@@ -19,47 +19,6 @@
-
- #include <elf.h>
- #include <assert.h>
--
--#ifdef RESOLVE_MAP
--/* We pass reloc_addr as a pointer to void, as opposed to a pointer to
--   ElfW(Addr), because not all architectures can assume that the
--   relocated address is properly aligned, whereas the compiler is
--   entitled to assume that a pointer to a type is properly aligned for
--   the type.  Even if we cast the pointer back to some other type with
--   less strict alignment requirements, the compiler might still
--   remember that the pointer was originally more aligned, thereby
--   optimizing away alignment tests or using word instructions for
--   copying memory, breaking the very code written to handle the
--   unaligned cases.  */
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--		 const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		 void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--			  void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--		  const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		  void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--			   void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA || defined ELF_MACHINE_PLT_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc);
--# else
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc);
--# endif
--#endif
--
- #include <dl-machine.h>
-
- #ifndef VERSYMIDX
-
-Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Index: patches/glibc/2.5/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch
===================================================================
--- patches/glibc/2.5/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(revision 549)
+++ patches/glibc/2.5/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(working copy)
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-From http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-cvs-commit@pld-linux.org/msg00229.html
-Fixes
-  rtld.c: In function '_dl_start':
-  dynamic-link.h:47: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela_relative' declared but never defined
-  dynamic-link.h:41: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela' declared but never defined
-when compiling glibc-2.3.4 with gcc-4.0
-
-But see also
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-02/msg00000.html
-and
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-03/msg00008.html
-which seem to propose less radical fixes?
-
-Aha.  See also http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=721
-
---- glibc-2.3.6.orig/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:37.000000000 -0800
-+++ glibc-2.3.6/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:59.777820848 -0800
-@@ -19,47 +19,6 @@
-
- #include <elf.h>
- #include <assert.h>
--
--#ifdef RESOLVE_MAP
--/* We pass reloc_addr as a pointer to void, as opposed to a pointer to
--   ElfW(Addr), because not all architectures can assume that the
--   relocated address is properly aligned, whereas the compiler is
--   entitled to assume that a pointer to a type is properly aligned for
--   the type.  Even if we cast the pointer back to some other type with
--   less strict alignment requirements, the compiler might still
--   remember that the pointer was originally more aligned, thereby
--   optimizing away alignment tests or using word instructions for
--   copying memory, breaking the very code written to handle the
--   unaligned cases.  */
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--		 const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		 void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--			  void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--		  const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		  void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--			   void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA || defined ELF_MACHINE_PLT_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc);
--# else
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc);
--# endif
--#endif
--
- #include <dl-machine.h>
-
- #ifndef VERSYMIDX
-
-Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Index: patches/glibc/2.6.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch
===================================================================
--- patches/glibc/2.6.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(revision 549)
+++ patches/glibc/2.6.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(working copy)
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-From http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-cvs-commit@pld-linux.org/msg00229.html
-Fixes
-  rtld.c: In function '_dl_start':
-  dynamic-link.h:47: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela_relative' declared but never defined
-  dynamic-link.h:41: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela' declared but never defined
-when compiling glibc-2.3.4 with gcc-4.0
-
-But see also
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-02/msg00000.html
-and
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-03/msg00008.html
-which seem to propose less radical fixes?
-
-Aha.  See also http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=721
-
---- glibc-2.3.6.orig/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:37.000000000 -0800
-+++ glibc-2.3.6/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:59.777820848 -0800
-@@ -19,47 +19,6 @@
-
- #include <elf.h>
- #include <assert.h>
--
--#ifdef RESOLVE_MAP
--/* We pass reloc_addr as a pointer to void, as opposed to a pointer to
--   ElfW(Addr), because not all architectures can assume that the
--   relocated address is properly aligned, whereas the compiler is
--   entitled to assume that a pointer to a type is properly aligned for
--   the type.  Even if we cast the pointer back to some other type with
--   less strict alignment requirements, the compiler might still
--   remember that the pointer was originally more aligned, thereby
--   optimizing away alignment tests or using word instructions for
--   copying memory, breaking the very code written to handle the
--   unaligned cases.  */
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--		 const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		 void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--			  void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--		  const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		  void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--			   void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA || defined ELF_MACHINE_PLT_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc);
--# else
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc);
--# endif
--#endif
--
- #include <dl-machine.h>
-
- #ifndef VERSYMIDX
-
-Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Index: patches/glibc/2.6/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch
===================================================================
--- patches/glibc/2.6/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(revision 549)
+++ patches/glibc/2.6/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch	(working copy)
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-From http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-cvs-commit@pld-linux.org/msg00229.html
-Fixes
-  rtld.c: In function '_dl_start':
-  dynamic-link.h:47: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela_relative' declared but never defined
-  dynamic-link.h:41: error: nested function 'elf_machine_rela' declared but never defined
-when compiling glibc-2.3.4 with gcc-4.0
-
-But see also
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-02/msg00000.html
-and
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2005-03/msg00008.html
-which seem to propose less radical fixes?
-
-Aha.  See also http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=721
-
---- glibc-2.3.6.orig/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:37.000000000 -0800
-+++ glibc-2.3.6/elf/dynamic-link.h	2005-03-12 18:12:59.777820848 -0800
-@@ -19,47 +19,6 @@
-
- #include <elf.h>
- #include <assert.h>
--
--#ifdef RESOLVE_MAP
--/* We pass reloc_addr as a pointer to void, as opposed to a pointer to
--   ElfW(Addr), because not all architectures can assume that the
--   relocated address is properly aligned, whereas the compiler is
--   entitled to assume that a pointer to a type is properly aligned for
--   the type.  Even if we cast the pointer back to some other type with
--   less strict alignment requirements, the compiler might still
--   remember that the pointer was originally more aligned, thereby
--   optimizing away alignment tests or using word instructions for
--   copying memory, breaking the very code written to handle the
--   unaligned cases.  */
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--		 const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		 void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rel_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc,
--			  void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ! ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela (struct link_map *map, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--		  const ElfW(Sym) *sym, const struct r_found_version *version,
--		  void *const reloc_addr);
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_rela_relative (ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc,
--			   void *const reloc_addr);
--# endif
--# if ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA || defined ELF_MACHINE_PLT_REL
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rel) *reloc);
--# else
--auto inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
--elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map,
--		      ElfW(Addr) l_addr, const ElfW(Rela) *reloc);
--# endif
--#endif
--
- #include <dl-machine.h>
-
- #ifndef VERSYMIDX
-
-Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]