Re: pruning worthless glibc patches from CT-ng

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at crashcourse dot ca>]

thanks, mike.  as a start ...

On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> On Saturday 16 February 2008, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > 2.6.1/130-glibc-2.3.6-allow-gcc-4.0-elf.patch
>
> i'd like to think this isnt needed at all for 2.4+ since a fix was supposed to
> be committed to the 2.3 branch+
>
> > 2.6.1/110-glibc-2.3.5-allow-gcc4-wcstol_l.patch
>
> afaik, this is no longer needed either.  i had it in Gentoo for the 2.3.x
> series, but dropped it for 2.4 and never saw a complaint.  Debian uses it
> still in glibc-2.7, but dont know if that's just because they carried the
> baggage simply because it applied.

i'll toss the two patches above from the glibc patches directories for
glibc 2.5 and up, then deal with the rest.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq