This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR vs LINUX_DIR ?

From: Steven Scholz <steven dot scholz at imc-berlin dot de>
To: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:50:27 +0100
Subject: LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR vs LINUX_DIR ?

Hi,

I am using linux-2.6.14 on my embedded ARM system.

Should I use

LINUX_DIR=linux-2.6.14

or

LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR=linux-libc-headers-2.6.12.0

when building a cross tool chain with crosstool-0.38?

Thanks!

--
Steven

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LINUX_SANITIZED_HEADER_DIR vs LINUX_DIR ?
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]