This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi
Can I just #ifdef this code if compiled for sf?
I do have some patches for glibc to get rid of these in a soft float build.
Can I see these patches, please? (What is the #define for the FP?)
However as Ralf Baechle said in the other message, the kernel FP emulator works and is not that large of an overhead.
I also removed the FP Emulator in the kernel, just to be sure that no SF ins are executed (I can send the patch to the list, but I know there has already been discussion about this).
IMHO, if we say that we have a SF toolchain then there MUST NOT BE any SF ins, otherwise we have a "semi soft float" toolchain. Don't you agree?
Attachment:
glibc-2.3.3.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |