This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I have built a toolchain with crosstool-0.28-rc34 for arm-iwmmxt. I used gcc-3.4.0, glibc-2.3.2, binutils-2.14.90 and linux-2.6.8.1 kernel head files. I find it is needed to add GLIBC_EXTRA_CONFIG="--without-fp" in arm-iwmmxt.dat, or there is an error report: selected processor does not support "rfs r2". Then it progressed well. The toolchain can be used to compiled linux-2.6.8.1 kernel. But there is a weird feature about this toolchain. I built a linux-2.6.8.1 kernel image and busybox with it, then I run it in a xscale board, it always report: illegal instructions when the busybox is loaded. I overwrite the libc-2.3.2.so with an old one built with an old toolchain, then it works fine. I checked the two toolchains and found there is a different option in configuring GLIBC-2.3.2. The old toolchain uses CC="arm-linux-gcc -finline-limit=10000". After adding the option GLIBC_EXTRA_CC_ARGS="-finline-limit=10000" to arm-iwmmxt.dat, I got a new toolchain and run the kernel and busybox successfully. I could not find clear explanation about -finline-limit option with materials at hand. Does anybody know the usage of -flimit-inline? Any comment is appreciated. --Bridge ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |