This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
To what compiler names the wrapper should be applied to(out of 3 identical copies I have): /usr/local/bin/powerpc-linux-gcc.exe /usr/local/bin/powerpc-linux-gcc-3.3.2 /usr/local/bin/powerpc-860-linux-gnu-gcc I presume I should leave the first one (.exe) not to be wrapped - that is the one, where the wrapper should end-up going to - correct ? - should I wrap both two others or just one (which ?). PS Never did much shell scripting, left alone wrappers for compilers ... ;-) Thanks, Alex Dan Kegel wrote: Alexander Povolotsky wrote: >>> cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wold-style-definition' >>> cc1: error: unrecognized option `-fno-unit-at-a-time' The easiest way is probably to write a little shell script wrapper around your existing compiler that simply discards the options it can't handle, then invokes the existing compiler. Should be easy! e.g. #!/bin/sh for arg; do case $arg in -Wold-style-definition) ;; -fno-unit-at-a-time) ;; *) newargs="$newargs $arg" ;; esac done the-real-compiler $newargs Or something like that. - Dan ________________________________________________________________ Get your name as your email address. Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today! ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |