This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Problems in building xscale big endian toolchain

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: hbuerger at gmx dot de
Cc: crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>, linux-arm-toolchain at lists dot arm dot linux dot org dot uk
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:17:29 -0700
Subject: Re: Problems in building xscale big endian toolchain
References: <200409220911.56757.hbuerger@telco-tech.de>

Henry Bürger wrote:

I´ve tried your great croostool. It works fine in most cases. But as I tried to build a big endian toolchain for Intel XScale IXP425 with crosstool-0.28-rc36 and demo-arm-xscale.sh (eval `cat arm-xscale.dat gcc-3.4.1-glibc-2.3.3.dat` sh all.sh --notest) i got a ARM little endian toolchain. I thought XScale is big endian in each case ?? I saw that the configuration above applied the gcc-3.4.1/gcc-3.4.0-arm-bigendian.patch to gcc which is intend for set big endian as default ??


Only if the target name matches arm*b*.
If xscale is indeed always big-endian, we probably
should rename arm-xscale.dat to armeb-xscale.dat,
and edit it to say TARGET=armeb-xscale-linux-gnu
Could you give that a try and let me know if that
yields a working default-big-endian toolchain?
- Dan

--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problems in building xscale big endian toolchain
  - From: Lennert Buytenhek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]