Re: Where does crosstool get its "kernel" includes?

[Marius Groeger <mgroeger at sysgo dot com>]

Dan,

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Dan Kegel wrote:

> Marius Groeger wrote:
> > @Dan,Alex: Why are you using sanitized headers anyway, other than that it 
> > is probably ideologically nicer, smaller, etc. towards the apps? I'm only 
> > using regular headers and never ran into serious problems.
>
> There are a few apps that don't compile properly with
> regular kernel headers.  IMHO the right thing to do
> is fix the regular kernel source; usually it's fairly simple.
...
> (like maybe generic scsi and ext2?  I don't recall exactly.)

If you do recall, or happen to run into any of those issues again, 
will you drop me a line, please? I do recall certain peculiarities 
with very low level tools, but nothing ever made me even remotely 
consider using modified kernel headers. I would like to make sure 
nothing slipped my attention.

Regards,
Marius

--
Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
SYSGO AG                      Embedded and Real-Time Software
Voice: +49 6136 9948 0                  FAX: +49 6136 9948 10
www.sysgo.com | www.elinos.com | www.osek.de | www.imerva.com


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com