This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
That's why you ran into trouble with gcc-3.3.3. You hacked the .dat file to use a snapshot, but since the patches are taken from a directory named after the gcc version, you didn't get the patches.
Mmm, I'm sure I didn't - but I could be wrong. I was using the 0.27 crosstool to build it.
Does crosstool throw errors out if the patches don't apply cleanly? I assume they need to be re-diffed every now and again.
Are the gcc team taking the alt-arch patches and integrating them into the mainline faster these days?
So go back to your 3.3-ish snapshot, add the missing symlink in the crosstool/patches directory, and try again. No need to play with gcc-3.4 if all you wanted was to get 3.3 working.
Ahh, I went ahead because I kinda assumed 3.4 was stable. So is 3.3 the latest greatest stable gcc these days. I kinda lost track of there versioning scheme.
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |