This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 2004-08-16 at 02:34:18 Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> (You're also Dutch?)
Ja. :)
> I think it's applied correctly? I'm trying this with hardfloat, if
> I use fpa or vfp softfloat it does print the right number.
Hm, it sure still looks like glibc has swapped it around...
> volatile float x;
> x = 1.0;
> printf("%f\n", x);
Right, maybe something goes wrong here when the float is promoted to
double. Can you try declaring x as double?
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |