This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Back in March, Leon Woestenber asked on crossgcc (see http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-03/msg00039.html):
In crosstool, I have ... added the following patches to glibc-2.3.2 to solve the printf("%f") issue, at least for XScale, as discussed here:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm/2003-November/006590.html
This patchset is substantially different than the one mentioned in demo-arm-softfloat.sh, which refers to:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/2004-02/msg00104.html
Q2) Can someone with more knowledge than me on the issue, which patch is the better one for resolving the printf("%f") issue? They seem to take different approaches.
Nobody answered him back then. Can someone take a stab at it now? I'm trying to get crosstool-0.28 final together, and I'd like to get the arm softfloat issue nailed down right.
Thanks! - Dan
-- My technical stuff: http://kegel.com My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |