This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: crosstool, sparc64, linux 2.6.4, gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2 success

From: "M.H.VanLeeuwen" <vanl at megsinet dot net>
To: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 01:50:18 -0600
Subject: Re: crosstool, sparc64, linux 2.6.4, gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2 success
References: <40554BC8.749A5EC3@megsinet.net> <4055528F.2020703@kegel.com>

Dan Kegel wrote:
> 
> M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote:
> > Well for the fun, I tried building a sparc64 cross compiler
> > using the crosstool-0.27 and after a few tries successfully
> > built a x86(host) to sparc64(target) compiler.  I haven't
> > run the testsuite(s) but the 2.6.4 linux kernel built successfully.
> >
> > Could the below changes be included in the next release of crosstools?
> 
> Brilliant, I'll try to include them.  Shall I give you as
> the author of the patches?

Probably not..

patch 1 - backported from GLIBC CVS
patch 2 - 1st chunk backported, 2nd mine
patch 3 - backported from GLIBC CVS

> 
> I haven't been brave enough to use parallel make myself yet,
> but now maybe I'll give it a shot.
> - Dan
> 
> --
> My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
> My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- crosstool, sparc64, linux 2.6.4, gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2 success
  - From: M.H.VanLeeuwen
- Re: crosstool, sparc64, linux 2.6.4, gcc 3.3.3, glibc 2.3.2 success
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]