This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: implications and importance of --prefix?? what about -staticin GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG?

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: David Haworth <david dot haworth at 3soft dot de>
Cc: crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 23:26:24 -0800
Subject: Re: implications and importance of --prefix?? what about -staticin GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG?
References: <200311041734.hA4HYuH17556@europa.franklin.com> <3FA81130.8020206@kegel.com> <20031105065233.GA24729@3soft.de>

David Haworth wrote:

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:50:56PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:

Try building a recent gcc with --with-sysroot and a relative
path ... the gcc installation guide now mentions this.

It would be nice if the path were relative to an arbitrary
environment variable --- e.g. --with-sysroot=$FOO_BASE/gcc
(with suitable shell escapes of course)

Is this possible?


Urm... no need.  It's relative to dirname(argv[0]), I think.
Or are you using some automounter that gets in the way of things like `cd $foo/..; pwd`?)

- Dan


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: implications and importance of --prefix?? what about -static in GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG?
  - From: David Haworth

References:
- Re: implications and importance of --prefix?? what about -static in GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG?
  - From: Duane Ellis
- Re: implications and importance of --prefix?? what about -staticin GCC_EXTRA_CONFIG?
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]