This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: SV: Problems with arm-elf with soft-float

From: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com>
To: <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Cc: "Jan Van Belle" <Jan dot Van_Belle at alcatel dot be>,<crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 19:30:34 +0200
Subject: RE: SV: Problems with arm-elf with soft-float

> This is an object file marking bug.  An arm-elf-gcc compiler 
> is soft-float 
> by default, but objects compiled with the default options are 
> effectively 
> marked by the assembler as being hard-float (since not-marked 
> is identical 
> to hard-float).  The best solution is to drop -msoft-float from your 
> compilation options -- it won't alter the code you get.
> 
> R.

Ah!

Some questions:

- has this been reported (or fixed) for GCC 3.3? 

- slightly related: I need the interwork code, and I 
had to modify the t-arm-elf file to enable those libgcc.a 
permutations. Is this the proper way to do it? 


If modifying t-arm-elf is required, I'm a bit unsure what
--enable-interwork does.

Øyvind

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SV: Problems with arm-elf with soft-float
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]