This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Wiki useful?

From: "William A. Gatliff" <bgat at billgatliff dot com>
To: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:07:17 -0600
Subject: Re: Wiki useful?
References: <20021105214741.A14099@saturn.billgatliff.com> <3DC89640.6000709@kegel.com>
Reply-to: bgat at billgatliff dot com

Dan:

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:10:40PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I generally hate Wikis.  They are never as good as a
> hand-coded page.

Sure, and I'd probably agree.  But if you're waiting around for me to
hand-code an HTML page, that's what you'll be doing--- waiting.  :^) I
just can't be as prolific as a Wiki script, my specialties lie
elsewhere...

Ok, so it ain't perdy, but I like to think my wiki (which I've
shamelessly named the "crossgcc wiki" because I like to think of it as
a resource for crossgcc users, and not a replacement for the crossgcc
mailing list and archives) is a pretty useful data dump anyway...

b.g.
-- 
Bill Gatliff
Embedded Linux and GNU development and training services.
See http://billgatliff.com for details.

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wiki useful?
  - From: Paul Whitfield
- Re: Wiki useful?
  - From: Dan Kegel

References:
- Wiki useful?
  - From: William A. Gatliff
- Re: Wiki useful?
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]