This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: m68k assembler (and MRI tools)

From: Werner Tuchan <32768 at gmx dot net>
To: Bruce Adams <bruadams at tycoint dot com>
Cc: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:12:23 +0200
Subject: Re: m68k assembler (and MRI tools)
References: <C9150052B112D3119E9E0004ACA6E437025AFDE3@tepg1.tepg.co.uk>

Bruce Adams wrote:

Hi,
I just tried it with binutils-2.13, newlib-1.10.0 & gcc-2.95.3-5-src (as downloaded from the cygwin setup) and it fails in the usual place for me
(or rather a usual as I have several 'usual' failures at the moment )-:
I don't hold up much hope of a different version of gcc behaving any better.
Regards,
Bruce A.

I can confirm that gcc 2.95.3-5 fails building at the same place while gcc 2.95.3 compiles properly. AFAIK gcc 2.95.3-5 is not a official release of the FSF but obviously only a special version meant to produce the native compiler of cygwin only and has probably never been tested against any other target. You should give the original gcc 2.95.3 a try.

------
Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- RE: m68k assembler (and MRI tools)
  - From: Bruce Adams

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]