This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: m68k assembler

From: "Aaron J. Grier" <aaron at frye dot com>
To: crossgcc <crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:24:48 -0700
Subject: Re: m68k assembler
References: <C9150052B112D3119E9E0004ACA6E437A4776F@tepg1.tepg.co.uk>

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:48:29AM +0100, Bruce Adams wrote:

> Thanks.  I can now see that the dialect does not match that of the
> code base I wish to port (including some third party source).  Is
> there any way I persuade gas to accept my dialect or must I abandon
> this endeavor and switch to a commercial product (I feel dirty just
> saying that :-).

--register-prefix-optional will "fix" the d0 vs %d0 issue, and a little
sed (or perl) goes a long way in the assembly world for translating
between incompatible assembly formats.

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier  |   Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR   |  aaron@frye.com

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

References:
- RE: m68k assembler
  - From: Bruce Adams

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]