This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, I'm trying to build glibc for sh4. After installing the kernel headers to the right place and building binutils and gcc for the target, I try to build glibc. All seems to be building fine, until: In file included from ../include/netinet/in.h:1, from ../resolv/resolv.h:64, from ../include/resolv.h:11, from ../linuxthreads/internals.h:23, from thread_dbP.h:8, from td_init.c:21: ../inet/netinet/in.h:259: parse error before '(' token ../inet/netinet/in.h:259: parse error before "__u32" ../inet/netinet/in.h:260: parse error before '(' token ../inet/netinet/in.h:260: parse error before "__u16" ../inet/netinet/in.h:262: parse error before '(' token ../inet/netinet/in.h:262: parse error before "__u32" ../inet/netinet/in.h:264: parse error before '(' token ../inet/netinet/in.h:264: parse error before "__u16" In file included from ../include/netinet/in.h:1, from ../resolv/resolv.h:64, from ../include/resolv.h:11, from ../linuxthreads/internals.h:23, from thread_dbP.h:8, from td_init.c:21: ../inet/netinet/in.h:285:1: warning: "ntohl" redefined /home2/dimator/opt/sh4/sh-linux/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:169:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ../inet/netinet/in.h:286:1: warning: "ntohs" redefined /home2/dimator/opt/sh4/sh-linux/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:175:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ../inet/netinet/in.h:287:1: warning: "htonl" redefined /home2/dimator/opt/sh4/sh-linux/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:168:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ../inet/netinet/in.h:288:1: warning: "htons" redefined /home2/dimator/opt/sh4/sh-linux/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:174:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition My hack was to comment out the offending lines from glibc-2.2.5/inet/netinet/in.h. This gets the build to finish, but it's pretty crude. Another approach might be to #undef the 4 functions just before the redefining lines in netinet/in.h. This would allow the kernel to have it's own versions of the functions, and userspace programs who include netinet/in.h to have their own as well. Has anyone else ran into this problem? Thanks Dimi ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |