This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Ross, The answer is an unqualified YES. C++ was minimally supported in the 2.7.2 release of VxWorks. There are some patches supplied by them but universal conformance is lacking. Namespace, and STL are some common points of contention. DaveK has a web page that will assist you in upgrading the compiler to version 2.95.3 and with his updated scripts re-named to 2.95.4. ( http://www.lysergic.u-net.com ). He may even have some updates not posted (DAVE?) WindRiver is stating that they will release a new version of gcc (2.96) but I will wait and see. The best information I have from the GNU GCC web site is that 2.96 is the initial release of GCC 3.0.x but that is unconfirmed. Good luck Jimm Burk jburk@peerless.com Sr. Embedded Software Engineer Peerless Systems Imaging Products 20415 72nd Ave South Suite 400 Kent, Washington 98032 (253) 395-8890 ext. 50 -----Original Message----- From: Ross A. Osborn [mailto:rosborn@motorola.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:52 AM To: crossgcc@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gcc 2.96? On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:22:05AM -0400, ChengHsin Hsu wrote: > Hi All, > > Quick question: Can I find the source code for gcc-2.96 in FSF's cvs > tree? :p > Thanks!!! > > Regards, > Bear. > > > hawley{chsu}120: ccmips -v > Reading specs from > /home/chsu/VW542/host/sun4-solaris2/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/mips-wrs-vxworks/ gcc-2.96/specs > gcc version gcc-2.96 19990621 VxWorks 5.4 I'm not really answering your question but I have a couple of related questions of my own. We have vxworks for both ppc and 68k processors. Both of the cross compilers report the same version info: $ ccppc --version cygnus-2.7.2-960126 egcs-971225 tornado 2.0 This looks to me like an antique version of egcs. Is this true? Are newer versions of gcc significantly better than this version? My impression has been that a lot of the work on the compiler in the last several years has been to improve C++ compiling. We have a lot of C++ here so would trying to build our own cross compiler be worth the effort? Thanks, Ross ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |