This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 04:20:13PM +0100, Rupert Wood wrote: > > gcc-2.96 is produced by RedHat only, and the FSF hate them for that > > because they say it is broken. RedHat denies. I don't know. > > 'hate' is a little strong. GCC is free software and, IMO, Red Hat can > release whatever they like as long as they're willing to support it > (which they did). Arguably they shouldn't have called it GCC 2.96 > without running that past the GCC SC first but I don't think they did > anything else wrong. In any case, Red Hat host gcc.gnu.org and a lot of > @redhats contribute a lot to GCC - I wouldn't knock them. All very valid points -- 'hate' is the feeling I got reading some flames here and there. In case I wasn't clear, I don't want to knock anybody, both the FSF and RedHat do a great job in their respective areas. Sorry if my wording was too short :) /Y ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |