This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
David: I've found this to be less than universally supported. I just tried it on my gcc-3.0.4-based SH toolchain, for example, and got nothing except mangeld function names in the assembly output--- no source lines whatsoever. I've found that objdump consistently does a better job. Just my $0.02, b.g. On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:35:21AM -0700, David Dyck wrote: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 at 08:11 -0500, William A. Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.co...: > > > Gcc's -S will produce assembly language. Likewise, you can compile > > with -c and -g, then run objdump --source on the object file. > > Thanks for the mention of objdump --source (I missed that), but I find using > the comiler/assembler useful to generate mixed assembly/source.o > Maybe you will too? > > gcc -Wa,-adhln,-L -g -c > -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |